Stowe rep pushes ethics bill modeled after CFV proposal
Vermont is one of three states that does not require public officials to disclose financial information, and it is one of eight states that does not have an ethics commission, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Rep. Heidi Scheuermann, R-Stowe, disagrees with the conventional wisdom.
"Just because our state is small, and we're very accessible to our constituents doesn't mean that transparency and accountability are there," Scheuermann said. "I'm not accusing anyone of anything but I think it's important. Even the perception of a conflict of interest can be reality. In politics, perception is reality. That perception or true conflict should be considered."
Scheuermann wants to see the General Assembly adopt guidelines for ethical behavior that would establish strict rules of conduct for lawmakers, statewide officeholders and appointed officials. Her bill, H.846, also includes the formation of a Vermont Ethics Commission.
H.846, is sponsored by 23 other lawmakers, Republicans and Democrats, and it is modeled after a proposal floated by Campaign for Vermont, a 501c4 advocacy group that has been critical of the Democratically controlled Legislature.
Scheuermann's bill would address the "revolving door" phenomenon in which state officials leave public office to lobby on behalf of unions and corporations, or work for the very entities they once regulated. Under the proposal, an official who has served as an elected official or appointee would be restricted from appearing before the Legislature for a two-year period.
Certain conduct for current officeholders and appointees would also be prohibited.
The policy would apply equally to representatives, agency secretaries, appointees of the governor and the governor himself.
H.846 also creates a five-member Vermont Ethics Commission that would have the authority to investigate violation complaints, complete with subpoena power.
The civil penalty for violating the code of conduct would be as much as $10,000 per violation.
The financial disclosure language in the draft now circulating in the House Government Operations Committee is not likely to survive the cutting room floor. Scheuermann says she doesn't oppose pulling the provision, which currently requires all officials to disclose the name of their business or employer, assets of more than $5,000, and the source of any income that exceeds $30,000.
"It's a part-time Legislature, it's a citizen Legislature, we have a difficult time recruiting people to do this kind of job," Scheuermann said. "I don't want to make it so really qualified people wouldn't run."
TALK TO US
If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.